2013-10-30

digitaldiscipline: (Get Off My Lawn!)
Couple of book reviews of the sketchy sort, because both books are too bad to finish reading. Fortunately, they were free in exchange for Amazon reviews if they warranted a moderately robust number of stars.

They don't.

The first, "Water Sign," is only an achievement in the sense that the author strung together enough words to reach novel length. The shape and smell of that achievement is unsavory, steeped in a fecund and fetid mixture of white privilege, othering, and neckbeardiness and wrapped up in a hamfisted bow of cultural appropriation. The only slightly redeeming feature of the first several dozen pages is a clumsy attempt at challenging gender essentialism, but it's carried off with all the grace and delicacy of someome carving sashimi with a lawnmower. The author's bio and web footprint do absolutely nothing to help make this more palatable, from his entitlement and self-aggrandizing attitude to the fact that he's surrounded with sycophants in lieu of editorial guidance. I use passive voice all the fucking time, and even *I* got annoyed that the entire book is written that way.

One gender-flipped icon of cultural appropriation out of five.

The second, "Revision 7: DNA," took longer to be terrible, because it was mostly just boring until it became stupid, offensive, misleading, and classist. There is an entire cast of unlikable, uniniteresting characters, the most engaging of which is an emerging-sentience robot that is mostly just a wide-eyed naif. Robots from the future that communicate among themselves with spoken English were dorky and implausible when the Daleks were introduced fifty years ago, before the advent of wi-fi; the fact that my radio and coffeemaker could do that if I bought nicer ones makes the author's purported professional life in the tech field as implausible as the authorial-insert character's dual brains due to parental experimentation. I won't even go into the contempt for every non-intellectual (and even the not-quite villain, who is hamfistedly sketched in as "looking lik Einstein and cranky about that being mentioned").. basically, everyone who isn't the main characer is held up as somehow inferior - dumber, more sympathetic, more idealistic - and yet we're shown an unending litany of this character's attempts to understand and empathize with their reactions, probably to show how sensitive he is despite (not really a spoiler) his being a robot himself, maybe.

The Terminator and Blade Runner called; they want you to stop pissing all over their shoes.

One and a half independently curious robots out of five.
digitaldiscipline: (clank)
As a counterpoint, and to prove that I can say nice things when I'm not being paid to, there are the first two books in [livejournal.com profile] suricattus/Laura A. Gilman's "PUPI" (Private Unaffiliated Paranormal Investigations) series (there are at least two more in my to-be-read pile, and she announced yesterday that a secondary character that readers meet in the 2nd book is getting a couple of books based on his office, too... these books are themselves a spin-off of another of her series, which I have not yet read, because when I bought a passel of her OMG I NEED TO CLEAN MY APARTMENT GET THESE BOOKS OUT OF HERE sale, I didn't get the first book in that series)

I joked with her on tumblr that I seem to be surrounded by snarky, sassy, twentysomething paranormal investigators who can't get laid by the hot guy they most want to bang, since that's the lot in life of both Bonita Torres in Gilman's books (so far) as well as Marnie Baranuik in AJ Aalto's.

In a world where magic and fae are everyday things, though not everyone has the capacity to interact with them. It's Raymond Chandler slapped with Lisa Mantchev and Elizabeth Bear (I'd suppose it could be said that it's Jim Butcher with the cardboard replaced with characters, but I haven't read Butcher, so that's a second-hand criticism at best). Gilman's fandom for programs like "Supernatural" shows strongly - the books read like episodes of an ensemble procedural, where the case isn't the point, and the characters' interplay is (this is both good, because strong, clever characterization makes up for a lot of ills when I'm the audience... and the denouement/climax of both books so far has been acutely underwhelming, in that it's over in the space of a relatively humdrum paragraph, happens offstage, or is implied to take place after the book ends).

Profile

digitaldiscipline: (Default)
digitaldiscipline

September 2019

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags