digitaldiscipline: (Default)
K & I finally saw Finding Nemo last night.

My opinion is that it was cute and clever, but . . . it's no PotC.

Maybe seeing it on something bigger than a 19" tv with a horde of shrieking parakeets [don't ask] and four women who wouldn't stfu would have improved the flick, but. . . Not obsession-worthy.
Date/Time: 2003-11-09 10:05 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] angel-renewed.livejournal.com
You clearly do not understand. I'm obsessive about both. I think it helps to love fish, but that's me.
Date/Time: 2003-11-09 10:30 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] etcet.livejournal.com
you're darn tootin' i don't understand, babe. Fish are self-propelled cat toys. *g*

i know i was the only one last night who caught at least two offhand references in it, but kim and i both agreed - we liked Monsters, Inc. better.
Date/Time: 2003-11-09 18:23 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] demented-angel.livejournal.com
Sorry you had to suffer through watching that with four females:) *Hugs*
Date/Time: 2003-11-09 21:27 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] etcet.livejournal.com
seven females, and one other guy.

but only three or four people wouldn't shut up. the pigeons and parakeets were much worse. heh
Date/Time: 2003-11-10 06:11 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] mykal.livejournal.com
But if you saw it ona big screen, you'd have to deal with a theater full of screaming kids and their bored parents. That's what we did.

So you're prolly better off with the parakeets.

Profile

digitaldiscipline: (Default)
digitaldiscipline

September 2019

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags