Easier-to-Navigate Pix

[digitaldiscipline]

http://www.chicagocemeteryphotos.com/c10/rafe_cam/index.htm

[my photos, courtesy of mpeace]

Comments

[etcet.livejournal.com]

i -did- get it, but can't email it from the office to the house. whatever the story with that zip file is, it's unliked by my mail server. [note the link location - not hosted at my end]

were i less residually exhausted, i'd be trying alternate means of getting it to the house. i'm not dissing your chops, M, i'm just not able to make use of what you sent me in an easy fashion. :-(

[micahra.livejournal.com]

Virus protection gone AWRY!

[micahra.livejournal.com]

BTW, I have found that if Outlook has removed a file because it deems it a danger, you can still get to it by hitting the forward button. the file is then accessable.

[etcet.livejournal.com]

i don't use outlook anywhere, ever, under any circumstances. mozilla at the house, outlook express at the office [where i rec'd it just fine]. i suspect that the security hellsop employs is what's niffling it, but don't have a problem with it. i can ftp it somewhere for retrieval, i just haven't been that motivated yet.

[argylerockstar.livejournal.com]

My usual way of combating this is to rename the file .abc instead of .zip before mailing it off and then converting the name back to .zip when I have it where I need it.

[hellsop.livejournal.com]

emails bigger than 10meg are rejected (use FTP). emails that push your mailbox over 100 meg are rejected. zipfiles aren't in and of themselves a problem unless they are slightly malformed in the same way netsky is. If this doesn't meet any of this criteria, contact me with the particulars, and I'll look into it. (Grepping logs blindly for rejects on your email account is a pretty futile exercise, since your address accounts for something like 300 rejects a day by itself, exclusive of all the fake addresses for your domain floating around...)

[etcet.livejournal.com]

I would wager to say that it doesn't meet those criteria [i've since done some mailbox maintenance and think it's sufficiently lean], though I didn't try to open it up to check for zip-weirdness.

One of the rejects would be from "havnengroup.com" [when i tried to send it from work to home], which should be sufficiently unique?