2004-09-08 10:47
digitaldiscipline
In an interview Monday with a group of foreign journalists and academics, [Russian Prime Minister] Putin rejected Western calls for negotiations with Chechen rebel representatives, Britain's Guardian and Independent newspapers reported.
"Why don't you meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks, ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace?" the Guardian quoted Putin as saying sarcastically.
[AP News excerpt]
WTP: We know better than to dictate other nations' foreign policy, but will gladly help out with exports of sarcasm.
"Why don't you meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks, ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace?" the Guardian quoted Putin as saying sarcastically.
[AP News excerpt]
WTP: We know better than to dictate other nations' foreign policy, but will gladly help out with exports of sarcasm.
(no subject)
I think it's dangerous to lump a politically separatist rebel group with a religiously motivated terrorist group. American independence is based on rebellion and guerilla warfare and economic terrorism, too.
On the other hand, the fact we cheer on the rebels of Star Wars who, among other things, blow up a HUGE space station and kill, no doubt, thousands of people, is just ironic.
(no subject)
I read a novel, once, where the protagonists were trying to overthrow a leader who was evil in their eyes, but who the author did a masterful job of portraying as very democratic, egalitarian, and fair. I wish I could remember the title, or the author, or even if it was actually published. . . it might have been one of the very few legitimately publishable manuscripts to cross my desk when I was a proofreader.
Americans root for the underdog. Victory over seemingly overwhelming odds is much more compelling than a big guy kicking a little guy's ass (David v. Goliath, USA over Russia in the 1980 Olympic hockey tournament, Luke over Vader, Rambo vs. Thousands of Unspecified Baddies, etc).
(no subject)
That's why it's so ironic. There's NOTHING underdogged about America. It's like... we never got over the emotional scars of being a little colony, so now that we're a big lumbering behemoth, we don't realize it. Until someone calls us a bully, and we get our feelings hurt and we go try to DESTROY them.
I've maintained that flying into the heart of the Deathstar to blow it up was an act of terrorism by a small group of dirty, backwater religious extremists against an economic superpower since about 09/12/01, and MAN do I get dirty looks for that. But I'm sorry, it's true.
(no subject)
i mean, they're -caucasian-! they aren't -terrorists!- the bad guys wore masks and goose-stepped and their leader was either creepy and wrinkly or a semi-robotic dude with faith in mysticism. . . wait, other than James Earl Jones' voice, did I just describe Cheney and Shrub?
Now hold on......
I don't think your position is backed up by the facts.
Re: Now hold on......
On the other hand, the companies and offices in the WTC included U.S. government offices (ATF, among others) and of course, World Trade Institute offices, as well as many other companies who may have been involved in any number of questionable activities. (I admit, I haven't been able to Google every company in the WTC to determine their relationships to Defense Department, but just having the ATF in there -- heya, Ruby Ridge and Waco -- is enough to prove my point. There were politically murderous organizations in that building.) No, you're right -- they did not have lasers mounted up on the roof to blast away villages in the Philippines. But I seriously doubt there was absolutely no blood on a single hand of those companies and organizations.
From the perspective of certain dirty backwater religious extremists, those towers were every BIT as destructive as the Death Star was in the eyes of the Rebel Alliance, and the U.S. is EXACTLY as horrible as the Empire.
As Rafe said, it's not exactly politic, but I don't think we can actually determine enough facts to dispute it fully. I stand by my metaphor. Don't think this means I think it was okay to bring down the WTC, because of course I don't. My cynicism is aimed more at the fact that we can gladly cheer on destructive rebels in moves, when their actions would be called terrorism in the real world.