2005-07-27 10:45![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
digitaldiscipline
digitaldisciplineIn the fine spirit of L. Ron Hubbard, the Pentecostals, and Aleister Crowley, I'm here today to start a new religion. Fortunately for everyone involved (all none of them), there are no silly initiations, hidden costs, or even tax loopholes. No, this is much more insidious.
Everyone Think.
Honestly, I think one of my biggest stumbling blocks to religion, among both those who discount it and those who practice it, is the branding of the Big G. Is there something out there? Maybe, but don't go slapping a crucifix logo or a six-pointed star logo or pentacle logo on it. Home-Brewed, For Personal Use Only.
People need divinity in a plain brown wraper. It'd keep them from having to smite the Joneses.
If everyone contemplated what they saw as the divine (capitalized or not) on a personal level, it wouldn't matter if the guy across the street did it a different way, as long as each person's version worked for them.
Not everyone needs something bigger than themselves to turn to; looking inwards, towards self-reliance, is just as valid.
From a conversation:
Nobody needs to prove that their god can beat up somebody else's god.
It's the same impossible approach I have to politics - delete the lazy intellectual shorthand of the formal parties, and make everyone reach for their own conclusions instead of blindly ascribing to a label that encompasses things inaccurately and incompletely.
Initially, people will probably feel lonely and isolated, "I don't have anyone else to share my faith with, or show me the way." But that will change. As people discover their own personal take on the divine, be it Buddy Christ, Foamy the Squirrel, or a small glow in the vicinity of their fourth rib, they will cherish how precise and perfect their discovery is for them. Church would be supplanted by get-togethers where people could talk about how their faith works for them, rather than being told how to do it, and that they'd be punished for doing it wrong.
Encourage somebody to craft something for themselves, and it will be more meaningful. Any boob with opposable thumbs and $68.75 can slap together something from IKEA. But there's pride in craftsmanship when make it yourself, and that can never be stripped away.
That's what's going to be weird about evanglizing - with nothing to market it, the idea needs to sell itself.
"I have the body of a God. Bacchus was a God, right?"
Everyone Think.
Honestly, I think one of my biggest stumbling blocks to religion, among both those who discount it and those who practice it, is the branding of the Big G. Is there something out there? Maybe, but don't go slapping a crucifix logo or a six-pointed star logo or pentacle logo on it. Home-Brewed, For Personal Use Only.
People need divinity in a plain brown wraper. It'd keep them from having to smite the Joneses.
If everyone contemplated what they saw as the divine (capitalized or not) on a personal level, it wouldn't matter if the guy across the street did it a different way, as long as each person's version worked for them.
Not everyone needs something bigger than themselves to turn to; looking inwards, towards self-reliance, is just as valid.
From a conversation:
H: Turning to oneself--the centerpoint of my atheism-- made me arrogant and self-righteous and at times utterly unbearable to be around.
Me: Hey, I resemble that remark! ;-)
H: It was like faith out of tune. Sounded right to my ears, but everyone around me was cringing.
Me: What's that old line about dancing and insanity. . . ?
Nobody needs to prove that their god can beat up somebody else's god.
It's the same impossible approach I have to politics - delete the lazy intellectual shorthand of the formal parties, and make everyone reach for their own conclusions instead of blindly ascribing to a label that encompasses things inaccurately and incompletely.
Initially, people will probably feel lonely and isolated, "I don't have anyone else to share my faith with, or show me the way." But that will change. As people discover their own personal take on the divine, be it Buddy Christ, Foamy the Squirrel, or a small glow in the vicinity of their fourth rib, they will cherish how precise and perfect their discovery is for them. Church would be supplanted by get-togethers where people could talk about how their faith works for them, rather than being told how to do it, and that they'd be punished for doing it wrong.
Encourage somebody to craft something for themselves, and it will be more meaningful. Any boob with opposable thumbs and $68.75 can slap together something from IKEA. But there's pride in craftsmanship when make it yourself, and that can never be stripped away.
That's what's going to be weird about evanglizing - with nothing to market it, the idea needs to sell itself.
"I have the body of a God. Bacchus was a God, right?"
◾ Tags:
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
(no subject)
On a more serious note I think you were talking down the Gnostic route. I think this was an internalized view of religion, I'm not sure but tI think the Cathars were a Gnostic sect. I'd pick the brains of
gnosticism
n : a religious orientation advocating gnosis as the way to release a person's spiritual element; considered heresy by Christian churches [syn: Gnosticism]
gno·sis ( P )
n.
Intuitive apprehension of spiritual truths, an esoteric form of knowledge sought by the Gnostics
(no subject)
I don't think conscious divinity would always be intuitive; I fully expect that introspection and self-examination, as well as observation of the world/universe at large, are things that would take some pretty heavy contemplation for a lot of folks.
Once you've approached [general "you" here] your own personal take on divinity, though, you might be able to more intuitively react to situations based on it. . . . like learning balance as part of studying dance - if someone throws a baby at you, you'll be better equipped to catch it, though it's not part of your established training.