2005-09-07 14:19![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
digitaldiscipline
digitaldisciplineElsewhere, it was suggested that forcing the remaining residents of the disaster that is New Orleans is the right thing to do. I disagree with this concept.
If people want to make unsafe decisions that could adversely affect their own welfare, they bloody well ought to be able to. If we take the stance that the remaining residents need to be removed, against their will for their own safety, to its logical conclusion, any potentially hazardous activity becomes illegal, from buying a beer to rock climbing. "We are the government, and we are here to protect you from yourself." No f'ing thanks.
The situation we have today, of mandatory safety legislation, frivolous lawsuits brought by people who, through their own stupidity, brought harm to themselves, is the beginning of this.
Darwin has failed us enough - let the stupid limit their own opportunities to breed. Legalize drugs, abolish helmet laws - but if you harm yourself, you waive your right to blame anyone else.
Freedom equals responsibility. I would much rather have both than neither.
If people want to make unsafe decisions that could adversely affect their own welfare, they bloody well ought to be able to. If we take the stance that the remaining residents need to be removed, against their will for their own safety, to its logical conclusion, any potentially hazardous activity becomes illegal, from buying a beer to rock climbing. "We are the government, and we are here to protect you from yourself." No f'ing thanks.
The situation we have today, of mandatory safety legislation, frivolous lawsuits brought by people who, through their own stupidity, brought harm to themselves, is the beginning of this.
Darwin has failed us enough - let the stupid limit their own opportunities to breed. Legalize drugs, abolish helmet laws - but if you harm yourself, you waive your right to blame anyone else.
Freedom equals responsibility. I would much rather have both than neither.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
On a different tangent, I agree that anarchy would create a "Might Is Right" situation wherein the intelligent would be at a disadvantage betimes. Thus, anarchy cannot be supported. Instead, laws must be utilized to establish a particular fairness...one that supports the idea of Darwinistic action and, if necessary, forces the populace to accept responsibility for their own actions.
The tenets of ancient Chinese legalism tend towards the establishment of such a society.
(no subject)
Ooooooo. Now you have my curiosity piqued. Do you have any good links, or should I just google it?
(no subject)
(no subject)