digitaldiscipline: (f*ck [by fireba11])
... when [livejournal.com profile] trid won for "Most Infuriating News Article Before Coffee" with this little gem.

Sorry, [livejournal.com profile] fenixinthedark, this one has it all over the one you shared for pure bile inducement.

And, for added fun, from the reply section, a friendly dose of Bush = Hitler. I wish I was kidding.

Where's my ounce of lead dispenser?
Date/Time: 2006-08-30 13:31 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] megiddo-lj.livejournal.com
His logic is flawed - to say the least. If we're going to use the analogy of pre-WW II then who are we calling Hitler? Bin Laden? Saddam? The whack job leader of Iran?

The difference - that the idiots in power don't seem to get - is that pre WWII Europe had a chance to disarm a centralized threat. There was no question as to where Hitler was or how to remove him. He was in Germany and the Nazi party was mostly limited to that country. A quick strike by the right military could have ended it.

We don't have that now. Islamic Fundamentalism is not centralized and there is no 1 leader or party that we can remove to make the world 'safe'. Short of a religious jihad against ALL muslims, we're going to have to accept that military power will not and, in fact, CAN NOT, bring us safety.

F*cking 'tards. Why does an armchair Zionist know more about this than our leaders?
Date/Time: 2006-08-30 13:41 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] etcet.livejournal.com
Because you're paying attention, that's why. Shit, the libertarian atheist knows more than those tools do, too.
Date/Time: 2006-08-30 16:14 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] fenixinthedark.livejournal.com
Well, ya can't win 'em all.

I'll go read this now... I needed to post the response first, as after, I'll probably be incapable of speech or typing (what with all the gnashing of teeth and rolling of eyes).
Date/Time: 2006-08-30 16:26 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] fenixinthedark.livejournal.com
RRRAAAAGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!

OMFG!!! Except the fact that those who destroyed the WTC buildings and landed a plane in the Pentagon had NO connection with Iraq... For the love of all that's pure and holy, when are people going to wake up to the *facts*??? This "war" had *nothing whatsoever* to do with "protecting Americans" or anyone else for that matter.

I knew this was gonna spike my bloodpressure. Now I need to go drive a little and allow my "drivers tourrettes" to vent some of this spleen.

Thanks, BTW... herkherkherk
Date/Time: 2006-08-30 18:39 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] etcet.livejournal.com
You want funny truth? At his press conference last week, Bush was asked what the 9/11 attacks had to do with Iraq, and his first answer was, "Nothing."

The truth hurts, especially when it slips out without lube. (the video is out there in several places :-)
Date/Time: 2006-08-31 01:33 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] dogsbody01.livejournal.com
Bush=Hitler?And we're only talking about the resemblence now?!

Profile

digitaldiscipline: (Default)
digitaldiscipline

September 2019

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags