(no subject)

[digitaldiscipline]

[courtesy of jaylake]

Comments

[i-renovated.livejournal.com]

Ohhhh. That's the shit right there. thanks for this...

[etcet.livejournal.com]

I wasn't a Clinton supporter at the time (I was strongly a-political during and after college); I think he just looks better by comparison.

[i-renovated.livejournal.com]

Hey, for me it's all about deficit vs. surplus. Show me the money, the rest is just BS. Numbers can lie--a little bit--but that kind of swing has a lot of truth in it.

[etcet.livejournal.com]

I should have clarified; I don't honestly remember how Clinton was, politically, but I think part of why he's been lionized lately is as a point of contrast to twenty-plus years of GOP suckitude... all he had to do was suck less (despite getting an ill-considered blowjob) to look relatively good in comparison.

[i-renovated.livejournal.com]

Very true, which is what I mean about the numbers. I don't understand the sudden nostalgia OR the vilification just ten years ago, when the numbers thing is what should count.

and...wait a minute, wait a minute...did you just say: despite getting an ill-considered blowjob? Are you sure you're a dude?! (and yes, I am completely and seriously joking...*snicker)

[scarecrow-23.livejournal.com]

Been saying it for years - the Democrats may be "tax and spend" which certainly isn't ideal but they at least pay for their spending. Meanwhile the Republicans are "don't tax and spend" [just as much anyway]. And we wonder why the economy has been do less than spectacular during the payoff administration...

[ladyheatherlly.livejournal.com]

That is just so much win.

[fikshun.livejournal.com]

that's art in the truest sense.

[ashbet]

Love it ^_^

-- A <3