digitaldiscipline: (Default)
I can see why this won a Hugo for Vernor Vinge.

The tech is clever, and presented beautifully. The characters are interesting and fairly complex and grow (mostly). The bad guys are refreshingly human (or not(?)).

On the whole, I don't know what, if anything, I was expecting, but I'm certain this wasn't it.

I admit to a preference for a bit of concrete detail to at least vaguely tether my imagination to; there was some, but it was affixed to things that did me no good, and glaringly absent from places where I desperately needed it. There are details presented as if what they signify should be obvious, but which I found to be utterly arbitrary and opaque. Most frustratingly, the denouement is so unfulfilling it makes Neal Stephenson look adept. I was left wondering, literally, "No, seriously; what the fuck happened?"
Date/Time: 2010-09-20 17:00 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] perspicuity.livejournal.com
ext_174465: (Default)
what's up doc? :)

#
Date/Time: 2010-09-20 17:35 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] etcet.livejournal.com
Ex-fucking-actly.
Date/Time: 2010-09-20 17:16 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] david-deacon.livejournal.com
the denouement is so unfulfilling it makes Neal Stephenson look adept

Ouch. Well put, however.

Profile

digitaldiscipline: (Default)
digitaldiscipline

September 2019

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags