2010-09-29 09:13
digitaldiscipline
I was entertained by the NPR coverage of how much the water in a hurricane weighs, though, doing some quick mental math afterwards, they could have made one very interesting point.
100,000,000 four-ton elephants = 400,000,000 tons, or about 800,000,000,000 (eight hundred billion) pounds.
If the average human being weighs around 120 pounds, and there are about 6.7 billion of us... a good-sized hurricane weighs as much as the entire human population.
That's a big twinkie.
100,000,000 four-ton elephants = 400,000,000 tons, or about 800,000,000,000 (eight hundred billion) pounds.
If the average human being weighs around 120 pounds, and there are about 6.7 billion of us... a good-sized hurricane weighs as much as the entire human population.
That's a big twinkie.
Listen! Do you smell something?
Dogs and cats living together, MASS HYSTERIA!!
Re: Listen! Do you smell something?
(no subject)
terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought.
(no subject)
Admittedly, it makes a hurricane and the human population come out at about the same, but even with 200 pounds, you'd need less than 30% bigger diameter (given the same height and density) to get "the whole of humanity" as the hurricane water weight.
(no subject)
I don't think there's any way the average human weighs 200#; even in obese first-world countries (ie: the US), it's 190 for men, 164 for women.
(no subject)
Looking at that, it seems as if the #190 only includes over-18s, so it may be vastly lower. FWIW, I usually prefer numbers that are low multiples of a power on 10 or a power of 2, depending on what I am estimating, so I'd prefer eithre "100" or "200" as a base number (and I usually go from "small to large", you seem to have gone from "large" to "small", since the numbers quoted turn out to be 119.something).
Anyway, you were within a binary order of magnitude and that is, as we say, close enough.
(no subject)
But, yes, those mass figures were for adults only, and, depending what the proportion of the world's population that is below that, not to mention the fact that impoverished or otherwise much-probably-lighter populations weren't polled at all, I think that an estimate for the average adult weighing something like 150 pounds isn't unreasonable, and knocking that down by a quarter to account for the youth population.
The data is frustratingly sparse to make an educated estimate, so that's why you get my napkin math.
(no subject)
And that turns out to be about 30% larger radius, with the same height ()don't know if that scales with diameter/radius or not) and density (that probably stays roughly the same, I guess).
(no subject)
I will spare everyone my attempt to render a cloud top profile in ASCII.
(no subject)
Ygor! Fetch me my goggles while I fire up the Jacob's Ladders!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)