2011-03-07 11:52
digitaldiscipline
You know how all those fiscal and social conservatives want to return to the good old days, right after WWII, that their nostalgia has tinted sepia and recast as a time of goodness and innocence?
I am for it, at least as far as taxation and income distribution are concerned.


That's right, guys; you're pining for the days of an 80%+ differential tax rate on the highest income.
... and yet have been doing nothing but calling me and the folks with whom I agree a "socialist" and "wealth redistributor" because we've suggested something in the 40-50% range.
But don't just take my word for it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/01/us-taxation-public-finance
I am for it, at least as far as taxation and income distribution are concerned.


That's right, guys; you're pining for the days of an 80%+ differential tax rate on the highest income.
... and yet have been doing nothing but calling me and the folks with whom I agree a "socialist" and "wealth redistributor" because we've suggested something in the 40-50% range.
But don't just take my word for it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/01/us-taxation-public-finance
(no subject)
I, on the other hand, agree very much.
(no subject)
(John Scalzi treats her as straight sci-fi rather than "serious" social commentary, and this makes sense to me.)
(no subject)
By the same token, I keep grumping whenever someone brings up "flat tax" as the solution to the world's problems. Mostly because I don't think it's right, but were it to go into effect, I'd make out like a fucking bandit. I'm unmarried with a moderately high household income, no dependents and I *rent*. So when ye aulde flat tax kicks in and all those deductions, credits, loopholes and "dodges" Go Away, if anyone's tax burden drops, it's mine.
(no subject)
and let's not even get into corporate tax breaks....
(no subject)