2011-05-10 20:37
digitaldiscipline
This essay on men's fashion came up in two different contexts today, and it kind of hit a nerve.
I had a fairly involved back-and-forth on this article via twitter, which I will summarize here (this is reposted in its entirety (but expanded somewhat) from another friend's blog, because copypasta is what's for dinner).
I'm afraid I find no points on which the author and I could come to agreement, save that comfortable clothes are a good thing.
I honestly only kind of vaguely understood the opening paragraph as even being written in English by context. Fashion is a foreign fucking language to me. I don't know if he was talking about articles of clothing, brands, designers, or what. He might as well have been discussing Czechoslovakian playwrights of the 18th century.
I am one of those crass, tasteless louts the author derides as "Is it clean? Then it's enough." For me? Yes; if it is the former, the vast majority of the time, it is the latter as well.
My attitude towards formal attire can be summed up as:
I look, and feel, like the same seven-year-old who resentfully wore hard shoes and a clip-on tie to his aunts' weddings whenever I have to wear anything fancier than slacks and a polo shirt. Frankly, I resent even having to dress that nicely at my day job ("professionalism" and "dressing for success" be damned; I spend my day talking on the goddamned phone and occasionally carrying things around or mucking about under a desk).
"Dress for the job you wish you had." Okay... I'm wearing a pair of relaxed-fit jeans and nothing the fuck else; I'm dressed like a wealthy layabout who hits the gym and doesn't need to give a shit what anyone thinks of his attire. (looks like this, as of ten minutes ago, if you're curious.
Do I "look my best" in a t-shirt and jeans, shorts, or a Utilikilt? I honestly don't give a fuck. That's what I'm comfortable and happy wearing.
People tell me now nice / dashing / handsome / what-the-fuck-ever I look when I put on a shirt and tie. Bully for them, but I can't wait to take the damned things off, because they're uncomfortable, both physically and psychologically. Of course, I've done things to make the body under the clothes more presentable than the average sack of meat, so I don't feel the need to ornament (or conceal) it with fancy attire.
Guys, in the main, simply don't give a fuck how we look, or how other guys look. We appreciate how women look, and the general consensus is that, for the most part, women don't give a shit how guys look, either. For fuck's sake, people, think about how much time I spend looking at nearly-naked women; I'm not paying the slightest bit of attention to what THEY'RE wearing, what makes you think I'd give a damn what *I* have on?
I could live quite happily in nothing but a comfortable pair of jeans or a Utilikilt and some nice boxer-briefs. Sure, I'd be unfit for public consumption, but, really, other than needing to go out and buy groceries (assuming I could telecommute), I don't really have much of a need to interact with polite society anyway. As the man said, "No shirt, no shoes, no problem."
If this makes me a heathen or an uncultured throwback, so be it. I am thoroughly, stereotypically male in many respects, despite wishing my hair was still long and purple, my nails were painted black, and my tie-dyed skirts weren't falling to tattered rags.
I am comfortable with who and how I am, and while I don't begrudge the author his sartorial predilections, I refuse to be cast as some kind of second-rate being simply because I don't share them.
I had a fairly involved back-and-forth on this article via twitter, which I will summarize here (this is reposted in its entirety (but expanded somewhat) from another friend's blog, because copypasta is what's for dinner).
I'm afraid I find no points on which the author and I could come to agreement, save that comfortable clothes are a good thing.
I honestly only kind of vaguely understood the opening paragraph as even being written in English by context. Fashion is a foreign fucking language to me. I don't know if he was talking about articles of clothing, brands, designers, or what. He might as well have been discussing Czechoslovakian playwrights of the 18th century.
I am one of those crass, tasteless louts the author derides as "Is it clean? Then it's enough." For me? Yes; if it is the former, the vast majority of the time, it is the latter as well.
My attitude towards formal attire can be summed up as:
"I will dress nicely when someone fucking dies."Until a week ago, I owned two suits and four sport coats / blazers / whatever the hell they're called. A friend is having a garage sale, and, as I haven't worn anything but the suit since my grandfather died (several years ago), it seemed foolish to waste closet space on them (especially after trying them on and recognizing that I was a much differently-shaped guy when I got them, and now they don't simply fit poorly, they barely fit at all. You know that standard literary trope of describing the hired goons/thugs/bodyguards whose suits don't allow them to raise their arms? We're talking that level of not-fitting-ness).
I look, and feel, like the same seven-year-old who resentfully wore hard shoes and a clip-on tie to his aunts' weddings whenever I have to wear anything fancier than slacks and a polo shirt. Frankly, I resent even having to dress that nicely at my day job ("professionalism" and "dressing for success" be damned; I spend my day talking on the goddamned phone and occasionally carrying things around or mucking about under a desk).
"Dress for the job you wish you had." Okay... I'm wearing a pair of relaxed-fit jeans and nothing the fuck else; I'm dressed like a wealthy layabout who hits the gym and doesn't need to give a shit what anyone thinks of his attire. (looks like this, as of ten minutes ago, if you're curious.
Do I "look my best" in a t-shirt and jeans, shorts, or a Utilikilt? I honestly don't give a fuck. That's what I'm comfortable and happy wearing.
People tell me now nice / dashing / handsome / what-the-fuck-ever I look when I put on a shirt and tie. Bully for them, but I can't wait to take the damned things off, because they're uncomfortable, both physically and psychologically. Of course, I've done things to make the body under the clothes more presentable than the average sack of meat, so I don't feel the need to ornament (or conceal) it with fancy attire.
Guys, in the main, simply don't give a fuck how we look, or how other guys look. We appreciate how women look, and the general consensus is that, for the most part, women don't give a shit how guys look, either. For fuck's sake, people, think about how much time I spend looking at nearly-naked women; I'm not paying the slightest bit of attention to what THEY'RE wearing, what makes you think I'd give a damn what *I* have on?
I could live quite happily in nothing but a comfortable pair of jeans or a Utilikilt and some nice boxer-briefs. Sure, I'd be unfit for public consumption, but, really, other than needing to go out and buy groceries (assuming I could telecommute), I don't really have much of a need to interact with polite society anyway. As the man said, "No shirt, no shoes, no problem."
If this makes me a heathen or an uncultured throwback, so be it. I am thoroughly, stereotypically male in many respects, despite wishing my hair was still long and purple, my nails were painted black, and my tie-dyed skirts weren't falling to tattered rags.
I am comfortable with who and how I am, and while I don't begrudge the author his sartorial predilections, I refuse to be cast as some kind of second-rate being simply because I don't share them.
(no subject)
But do I do so on a regular basis? No. Do I want to? No. It's a tremendous amount of work and has the potential to be an all-consuming hobby. I'd certainly not expect people to dedicate their time to it if they don't want to.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Ha*.
* The Full Nelson, of course, is a Ha Ha.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I did recognize the labels/design houses in that article, but I doubt I could succeed at a matching game of garment to label these days.
Good quality and good fit are much more important to me than the name on the label. And both of these are key to fancy clothes being more comfortable.
As far as wearing fancy clothes, I'd rather wear a nice wool suit, including tie, than wear pantyhose. My goal for next year's office party is to have a new tux (one that fits properly made of nice wool) to wear so I can be more comfortable.
(no subject)
My experience is you're wrong on that point & that's why being able to dress fancy is a good thing. Especially in places where nobody else does.
ZZ Top knew what they were singing about.
Of course, they need to fit well, you need to feel comfortable wearing them and they should not look like they're intended for a job interview.
Also, you get better service near enough everywhere.
Final point - I completely agree with your last paragraph. What clothes a person chooses to wear doesn't define them.
(no subject)
There are times & places for every type of clothing, & it pays to have an understanding of the social niceties & subtitles. Better service is the tip of the iceberg (but it's a pretty handy one to start with ;-).
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
People ask me what it would take to get me to move back to New York City, and I am not kidding when I say "A million dollars a year." It's the same kind of constant, nagging irritation that being forced to dress a certain way imposes, and that's akin to the management situation.
(no subject)
I think the difference may be that we don't necessarily judge ONLY on how men look.
A well-dressed man - and by that, I usually but do not always mean "anyone who isn't wearing either a blue-collar uniform or the same old boring crap - will definitely catch my eye. Eve a man wearing the *right* blue collar uniform or the same old boring crap might catch my eye. Even a man who looks good in his jeans or khakis is well worth looking at.
Of course, "good" is up for debate.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, one may or may not be noticed despite or because of what one wears, but one will probably be noticed MORE if one dresses up, because women who don't care will notice no less, and women who do care will notice more. If one doesn't care to be noticed, it won't matter much. And, of course, if one doesn't want to risk being noticed by someone who cares about clothes, by all means, one should not dress up!
(no subject)
(no subject)
I'm in agreement even though I very rarely get dressed up. I wear a dress about once every 1-3 years.
(no subject)
I wear a suit, sometimes, as you know, and I love how I detourn it innately, with hair and tattoo, even if I don't wear my New Rocks with it. But life's too short to constantly be thinking of appearance. Wear special stuff for special occasions, and everyday stuff every other day.
(no subject)
I think it's disingenuous to say men don't give a fuck what other men look like. Would Conan the Barbarian have looked right wearing jeans and a tshirt? Hell, no. Clothes often do make the man.
(no subject)
I think that dressing for a role is different than dressing for daily life (however, I won't entirely discount the argument, if someone wants to make it, that "cubicle drone" is a role to dress up for... I will just feel deep and abiding pity for anyone who needs to role-play their day job.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Making the point: I'm currently wearing an oversized grey t-shirt with a witch on it, black pants, and hair in a ponytail... oooh, so over the top stylish! ;)
(no subject)
Ah well. To their credit, they've managed to find me a few fashionable articles of clothing that look nice on me and are not uncomfortable so I pick from that pile of clothes whenever I think I'm supposed to look nicer than someone coming directly from the gym.
(no subject)