digitaldiscipline: (batman)
Randomly gifted with a fairly nice, black, Nike dri-fit golf shirt from Dell at work the other day, I decided to wear it this morning.

It's an XL, which, admittedly, I'm not. However, the contrast between the fit of an XL and my more habitual Ls (with a couple of Ms) has got me thinking about the concept of vanity sizing for guys.

Yes, part of my goal when I started lifting was to outgrow my Medium polo shirts, at least through the arms, shoulders, and upper back (there's nothing to be done about length; no lift I've found will actually make me any taller, dagnabbit). That's on the forseeable horizon, and not just because of my penchant for washing my laundry in warm or hot water (cotton shrinks; this dry-weave/dri-fit/wicking stuff is fucking amazingly resilient to that sort of stupidity). So, it's not surprising that I'm most comfortable in shirts with an L on the tag.

However, that doesn't stop it from fucking with my head a little, because I'm still the same not-precisely-large person in there that I feel like I've always been. People meeting me in person for the first time seem to be surprised that I'm as slightly-smaller-than-average as I really am.

(reference: http://www.halls.md/chart/height-weight.htm - use the "white boy" tables)

Height: A tad under 25th percentile (5' 7.5")
Weight: Right at 50th percentile (~180#)

I dunno about you, but "bottom quartile and absolutely fucking average" do not really combine to equal "large" by any calculus I can readily invent.

Has the average men's shirt size been shrinking, so that guys can feel bigger than they actually are while women's sizes have done the opposite? I have no fucking idea.

I just know that the only thing about me that I usually think is big is my mouth.
Date/Time: 2011-09-28 17:03 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] baobh.livejournal.com
Oh, what fun little charts. I'm somewhere around the 80th percentile in weight and...uh...110th'ish percentile for height? Well, I feel special.

It could be the cut of the shirt; there has been a tendency towards slimmer cuts in tees recently. My men's size L tees from 10 years ago are more block shaped than the same size tees from the last year.

Also, your weight does not necessarily have anything to do with where you carry your bulk; from the pics I've seen from D*con, you've put a whole lot on your back, chest and arms, whereas the vast majority of men carry their weight around their guts. It is similar to problems that I have with shirts: the chest is too tight and it is baggy around my waist. You just aren't shaped like an "average" guy, m'dear.
Date/Time: 2011-09-28 17:44 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] etcet.livejournal.com
I've noticed the more fitted tendency of shirts, too, though a 2009 Large seems smaller than a 1999 vintage one.
Date/Time: 2011-09-29 21:07 (UTC)Posted by: [personal profile] ivy
ivy: (hoodie on vikingbeast)
Heh. I'm somewhere just over 95% for height, so I feel you.

Profile

digitaldiscipline: (Default)
digitaldiscipline

September 2019

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags